Compare
Apollo vs Figure 02
Quick verdict
Apollo leads on 8 of 11 comparable rows
Apollo leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Payload (+4 more). Figure 02 leads on Mobility, Autonomy, and Home Navigation.
Who should choose which?
Choose Apollo if…
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
- Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Figure 02 if…
- Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Apollo if…
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
- Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Figure 02 if…
- Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
| Performance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Readiness Score | 76 | 72 |
| Reality Score | 84 | 66 |
| Data Freshness | 100% | 85% |
| Speed | Unknown | 4.3 km/h |
| Payload | 25 kg | 20 kg |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 173 cm | 168 cm |
| Weight | 72.5 kg | 70 kg |
| Battery | Unknown | 5 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $50,000+ | Unknown |
| Market Status | Limited | Prototype |
| Availability | Limited | Prototype |
| Countries | United States, Germany | United States |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 80 | 85 |
| Manipulation | 86 | 80 |
| Perception | 78 | 75 |
| Autonomy | 68 | 70 |
| Social Interaction | 62 | 55 |
| Home Navigation | 55 | 72 |
| Sensors | Perception stack unpublished on Apollo 2 page; LED mouth, chest status display, speech | 6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, Fleet Connect APIs (typical) | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, 5Gi |
| Ecosystem | Apollo 2 (bipedal or wheeled); Apptronik Artemis; Fleet Connect; Google DeepMind Gemini Robotics; Robot Park data collection; Hot-swappable battery packs; Enterprise pilot programs | Helix AI (company stack); Custom fleet management |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.