HRHOMEBOT RADAR
Compare

Apollo vs XMAN-R1

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

Apollo leads on 8 of 11 comparable rows

Apollo leads on Reality Score, Speed, Payload, and Battery (+4 more). XMAN-R1 leads on Perception, Autonomy, and Social Interaction.

Who should choose which?

Apollo
Choose Apollo if…
  • Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
  • Budget is a priority and Apollo lists lower ($50,000+).
  • Your main goal is home assistant, which Apollo targets directly.
  • Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
XMAN-R1
Choose XMAN-R1 if…
  • Your main goal is conversation, which XMAN-R1 targets directly.
  • Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Spec
Apollo
Apptronik
Leads 8
XMAN-R1
KEENON Robotics
Leads 3
Performance
Readiness Score
76
76
Reality Score
84
72
Data Freshness
100%
100%
Speed3.4 km/h2.9 km/h
Payload25 kg3 kg
Specs
Height173 cm172 cm
Weight72.5 kg110 kg
Battery4 h3 h
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
Price$50,000+$100,000+
Market StatusLimitedLimited
AvailabilityLimitedLimited
CountriesUnited States, GermanyChina, United States
Intelligence
Mobility
80
74
Manipulation
86
70
Perception
78
84
Autonomy
68
78
Social Interaction
62
90
Home Navigation
55
52
SensorsStereo vision, IMU, force-torque sensing (fleet software stack)Multimodal fusion perception, spatial awareness, human-interaction sensing (fleet coordination stack)
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, fleet management APIsWi-Fi, KEENON cloud fleet platform
EcosystemNVIDIA Project GR00T; Apollo fleet software; Hot-swappable battery packs; Enterprise pilot programsKOM2.0 vision-language-action stack; KEENON ProS hotel domain models; Multi-robot fleet coordination with DINERBOT, KLEENBOT, BUTLERBOT, S100; KEENON App and Cloud Platform
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.
View Apollo →View XMAN-R1 →