Compare
Ballie vs Reachy 2
Quick verdict
Reachy 2 leads on 7 of 10 comparable rows
Ballie leads on Mobility, Social Interaction, and Home Navigation. Reachy 2 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Battery (+3 more).
Who should choose which?
Choose Ballie if…
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Ballie targets directly.
- Strengths like home navigation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
- You prefer a mobile form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
Choose Reachy 2 if…
- You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
- Your main goal is education, which Reachy 2 targets directly.
- Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
- You prefer a humanoid form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
Choose Ballie if…
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Ballie targets directly.
- Strengths like home navigation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
- You prefer a mobile form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
Choose Reachy 2 if…
- You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
- Your main goal is education, which Reachy 2 targets directly.
- Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
- You prefer a humanoid form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
| Performance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Readiness Score | 52 | 86 |
| Reality Score | 38 | 84 |
| Data Freshness | 83% | 85% |
| Speed | Unknown | Unknown |
| Payload | Unknown | 3 kg per arm |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 20 cm | 136–166 cm |
| Weight | Unknown | 32–50 kg |
| Battery | 2–3 h | 8–10 h |
| Form | Mobile | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | Unknown | $70,000+ |
| Market Status | Prototype | Limited |
| Availability | Prototype | Limited |
| Countries | Unknown | United States, France, Global (direct order) |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 74 | 68 |
| Manipulation | 8 | 88 |
| Perception | 78 | 86 |
| Autonomy | 70 | 72 |
| Social Interaction | 75 | 70 |
| Home Navigation | 82 | 58 |
| Sensors | Spatial LiDAR, front/rear cameras, IR transmitter, ambient light (inferred from demos) | 2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Samsung SmartThings | Ethernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI) |
| Ecosystem | Samsung SmartThings; Google Gemini; 1080p dual-lens projector; IR appliance control; Samsung mobile app (demos) | ROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo) |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.