Compare
EMO vs Reachy 2
| Spec | ![]() EMO Living AI | ![]() Reachy 2 Pollen Robotics |
|---|---|---|
| Readiness Score | 91 | 86 |
| Reality Score | 88 | 84 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 100% |
| Price | $279 | $70,000+ |
| Commercial Status | Buy Now | Limited |
| Form | Desktop | Humanoid |
| Height | 12 cm | 136–166 cm |
| Weight | 0.25 kg | 32–50 kg |
| Battery | 2.5 h | 8–10 h |
| Speed | Unknown | Unknown |
| Payload | Unknown | 3 kg per arm |
| Sensors | Camera, microphones, touch sensors | 2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Ethernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI) |
| Countries | United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany | United States, France, Global (direct order) |
| Social Interaction | 95 | 70 |
| Home Navigation | 15 | 58 |
| Ecosystem | Living AI app; Alexa integration | ROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo) |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.



