Compare
Figure 02 vs Kuavo 5
Quick verdict
Kuavo 5 leads on 8 of 12 comparable rows
Figure 02 leads on Battery, Price, Mobility, and Home Navigation. Kuavo 5 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Speed (+4 more).
Who should choose which?

Choose Figure 02 if…
- Budget is a priority and Figure 02 lists lower ($20,000+).
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Figure 02 targets directly.
- Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.

Choose Kuavo 5 if…
- Your main goal is education, which Kuavo 5 targets directly.
- Strengths like perception and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | ![]() Figure 02 Figure AILeads 4 | ![]() Kuavo 5 Leju RoboticsLeads 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 74 | 78 |
| Reality Score | 68 | 70 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 100% |
| Speed | 4.3 km/h | 5 km/h |
| Payload | 20 kg | 20 kg (reported) |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 168 cm | 173 cm |
| Weight | 70 kg | 63.5 kg |
| Battery | 5 h | 1 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $20,000+ | $50,000+ |
| Market Status | Prototype | Limited |
| Availability | Prototype | Limited |
| Countries | United States | China |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 85 | 82 |
| Manipulation | 80 | 84 |
| Perception | 75 | 88 |
| Autonomy | 70 | 72 |
| Social Interaction | 55 | 58 |
| Home Navigation | 72 | 62 |
| Sensors | 6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors | Orbbec Gemini 335L depth camera, Intel RealSense D405 wrist cameras (×2), Livox mid-360 LiDAR, 6-mic array, IMU, joint temperature sensors |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, 5Gi | Wi-Fi 6E/7, Ethernet, 5G (optional module) |
| Ecosystem | OpenAI integration (announced); Custom fleet management | Kuavo ROS control stack; HarmonyOS / KaihongOS; Huawei Pangu embodied AI (partner integration); Modular arms, hands, and Kuavo 5-W wheel base; Jetson AGX Orin dev stack |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.

