Compare
Figure 02 vs XMAN-R1
Quick verdict
Figure 02 leads on 7 of 14 comparable rows
Figure 02 leads on Speed, Payload, Battery, and Price (+3 more). XMAN-R1 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Countries (+3 more).
Who should choose which?
Choose Figure 02 if…
- Budget is a priority and Figure 02 lists lower ($20,000+).
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Figure 02 targets directly.
- Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose XMAN-R1 if…
- Your main goal is conversation, which XMAN-R1 targets directly.
- Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | Figure 02  Figure AILeads 7 | XMAN-R1  KEENON RoboticsLeads 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 74 | 76 |
| Reality Score | 68 | 72 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 100% |
| Speed | 4.3 km/h | 2.9 km/h |
| Payload | 20 kg | 3 kg |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 168 cm | 172 cm |
| Weight | 70 kg | 110 kg |
| Battery | 5 h | 3 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $20,000+ | $100,000+ |
| Market Status | Prototype | Limited |
| Availability | Prototype | Limited |
| Countries | United States | China, United States |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 85 | 74 |
| Manipulation | 80 | 70 |
| Perception | 75 | 84 |
| Autonomy | 70 | 78 |
| Social Interaction | 55 | 90 |
| Home Navigation | 72 | 52 |
| Sensors | 6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors | Multimodal fusion perception, spatial awareness, human-interaction sensing (fleet coordination stack) |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, 5Gi | Wi-Fi, KEENON cloud fleet platform |
| Ecosystem | OpenAI integration (announced); Custom fleet management | KOM2.0 vision-language-action stack; KEENON ProS hotel domain models; Multi-robot fleet coordination with DINERBOT, KLEENBOT, BUTLERBOT, S100; KEENON App and Cloud Platform |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.