Compare
Kuavo 5 vs Reachy 2
Quick verdict
Reachy 2 leads on 6 of 11 comparable rows
Kuavo 5 leads on Payload, Price, Mobility, and Perception (+1 more). Reachy 2 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Battery, and Countries (+2 more).
Who should choose which?

Choose Kuavo 5 if…
- Budget is a priority and Kuavo 5 lists lower ($50,000+).
- Strengths like perception and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.

Choose Reachy 2 if…
- You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
- Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | ![]() Kuavo 5 Leju RoboticsLeads 5 | ![]() Reachy 2 Pollen RoboticsLeads 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 78 | 86 |
| Reality Score | 70 | 84 |
| Data Freshness | 100% | 100% |
| Speed | 5 km/h | Unknown |
| Payload | 20 kg (reported) | 3 kg per arm |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 173 cm | 136–166 cm |
| Weight | 63.5 kg | 32–50 kg |
| Battery | 1 h | 8–10 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $50,000+ | $70,000+ |
| Market Status | Limited | Limited |
| Availability | Limited | Limited |
| Countries | China | United States, France, Global (direct order) |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 82 | 68 |
| Manipulation | 84 | 88 |
| Perception | 88 | 86 |
| Autonomy | 72 | 72 |
| Social Interaction | 58 | 70 |
| Home Navigation | 62 | 58 |
| Sensors | Orbbec Gemini 335L depth camera, Intel RealSense D405 wrist cameras (×2), Livox mid-360 LiDAR, 6-mic array, IMU, joint temperature sensors | 2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 6E/7, Ethernet, 5G (optional module) | Ethernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI) |
| Ecosystem | Kuavo ROS control stack; HarmonyOS / KaihongOS; Huawei Pangu embodied AI (partner integration); Modular arms, hands, and Kuavo 5-W wheel base; Jetson AGX Orin dev stack | ROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo) |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.

