Compare

NEO Gamma vs XPENG IRON

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

NEO Gamma leads on 6 of 8 comparable rows

NEO Gamma leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Manipulation, and Perception (+2 more). XPENG IRON leads on Data Freshness and Autonomy.

Who should choose which?

NEO Gamma
Choose NEO Gamma if…
  • You want higher readiness (88/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 78/100).
  • You need a pre-order path today while alternatives are still prototype or coming soon.
  • Strengths like social interaction and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
XPENG IRON
Choose XPENG IRON if…
  • Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
Performance
Readiness Score
88
74
Reality Score
78
60
Data Freshness
85%
98%
Speed5 km/h walk (1.4 m/s)Unknown
Payload8 kg arm / 25 kg carryUnknown
Specs
Height168 cmUnknown
Weight30 kgUnknown
Battery4 hUnknown
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
Price$20,000Unknown
Market StatusPre-orderUnknown
AvailabilityLimitedUnknown
CountriesUnited StatesUnknown
Intelligence
Mobility
82
82
Manipulation
86
78
Perception
80
76
Autonomy
58
70
Social Interaction
88
74
Home Navigation
84
52
SensorsDual 8.85MP stereo fisheye cameras, 4 beamforming mics, IMUNot specified on the September 2026 production-line release
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Bluetooth, 5GUnknown
EcosystemRedwood AI; 1X Expert remote guidance; Chores scheduling appXPENG Physical AI foundation model (on-device); VLT + VLA + VLM stack (AI Day 2025); Turing AI chips; XPENG store and campus deployments (planned)
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.